Zone 2 and Easy · Part 6 of 7
What is polarized training, and how does it compare with pyramidal?
Polarized training means most of your training is easy, a real share is hard, and the smallest share falls between your two thresholds. Pyramidal training is also mostly easy but puts more time in the middle than at the top, and trials that compared the two found about the same gains on average.
On this page
- What does polarized mean in the research?
- Is there one agreed definition of polarized?
- How is pyramidal training different?
- What did threshold-heavy weeks show?
- Which shape do top runners use?
- Does polarized training beat pyramidal training?
- Why can the same week look polarized or pyramidal?
- Where does the gray band fit?
- How do you choose between polarized and pyramidal?
- What Diastra does with polarized and pyramidal weeks
- More questions
- Sources
What does polarized mean in the research?
The research on training intensity starts with two lines. Seiler and Kjerland tested 11 young skiers who raced at the national level. A breathing test on a treadmill found each skier's first threshold and second threshold. Those two lines split training into three zones.[1]
Zone 1 is below the first threshold, where running feels easy. Zone 2 is between the two thresholds. Zone 3 is above the second threshold, where fatigue stacks up quickly. So the research's zone 2 is the middle. It is a different band from the Zone 2 on most watch charts, which is easy running.
A week is polarized when zone 1 is the biggest share, zone 3 comes next and zone 2 is the smallest.[2] Treff and colleagues gave two sample polarized weeks. One is 80% easy, 5% middle and 15% hard. The other is 75% easy, 5% middle and 20% hard.[2]
Seiler's skiers fit that shape. About 75% of their endurance sessions stayed in zone 1. About 8% landed in zone 2, and about 17% held long stretches in zone 3.[1] The page on 80/20 running covers where the pattern came from and how to count it by sessions or by minutes.
Is there one agreed definition of polarized?
Researchers still use the word in different ways. Treff and colleagues wrote that the term polarized "differs substantially between publications."[2] A 2022 review of world-class distance runners noted that these labels have been called vague.[4]
Treff's team proposed one score to settle it. They called it the polarization index. The score rises when the easy and hard shares grow, and it falls when the middle grows. A week is called polarized when the score is above 2.[2]
A trial of elite rowers shows the score at work. The polarized group scored 3.0, and the pyramidal group scored 1.9.[3]
How is pyramidal training different?
A pyramidal week is also mostly easy. The difference is in the smaller share. A pyramid puts more time in the middle than at the top, so each zone is smaller than the one below it.[2][4] Treff's sample pyramid is 70% easy, 20% middle and 10% hard.[2]
A threshold-heavy week is a third shape. It puts a large share of training in the middle. Treff's sample is 40% easy, 50% middle and 10% hard.[2]
Real study plans show how close the first two shapes are. Filipas and colleagues wrote both plans for well-trained runners and matched the training load.[5] In the first week, the pyramidal plan was 77% easy, 17% middle and 6% hard by minutes. The polarized plan was 80% easy, 6% middle and 14% hard.[5] The threshold group in Stöggl and Sperlich's trial did 46% of its sessions easy, 54% at threshold and none in the hard zone.[6]
| Shape | Easy | Middle | Hard | Where the numbers come from |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polarized | 80% | 6% | 14% | Filipas, planned minutes |
| Pyramidal | 77% | 17% | 6% | Filipas, planned minutes |
| Threshold-heavy | 46% | 54% | 0% | Stöggl and Sperlich, sessions |
The polarized and pyramidal weeks share almost the same easy base. They swap the middle share and the hard share.
What did threshold-heavy weeks show?
Threshold-heavy weeks did worse than polarized or pyramidal weeks in some trials and about the same in others. A review of 16 studies in middle- and long-distance runners found pyramidal and polarized training more effective than threshold training. The same review noted that some of the best marathon runners in the world use threshold training.[7]
Stöggl and Sperlich ran a nine-week trial in well-trained runners, cyclists, triathletes and skiers. The threshold group got slightly more economical, so a set pace or power took a little less energy. Its other endurance results did not change.[6] That group also trained fewer hours than the polarized group, 84 against 104.[6]
A 2024 review set polarized training against threshold training one plan at a time. It found no clear difference in VO₂max or time trials.[8] The 80/20 running page walks through those head-to-head trials one by one.
Which shape do top runners use?
Most top distance runners train in a pyramid. A 2022 review of highly trained and elite distance runners found a pyramidal pattern was typical. The runners shifted toward a polarized week in the racing season.[9]
The middle is never empty for these runners. World-class distance runners do 5 to 15% of their running as threshold runs at 83% to 87% of max heart rate. They do another 5 to 15% as faster intervals.[4] Both shares move up and down through the year.[4]
Does polarized training beat pyramidal training?
On average, the trials found no clear winner.
Treff and colleagues split 14 elite rowers into a polarized plan and a pyramidal plan for 11 weeks. Both groups did about 93% of their training easy. Neither plan did better than the other on any test.[3] The authors pointed to the very large easy share in both groups as a likely reason.[3]
Filipas and colleagues put 60 well-trained male runners on four 16-week plans with the same training load. All four groups improved. Eight pyramidal weeks followed by eight polarized weeks gave the biggest gains. That group cut its 5 km time by about 1.5%.[5] The gaps between groups were small. Most of the changes the study reported fell below the smallest change its tests could reliably detect.[5]
Two reviews pooled the trials. A 2024 review found no difference between polarized and pyramidal plans in VO₂max or in time trials.[8] A 2025 analysis used the raw data from 348 athletes in 13 studies. It also found no difference between the two shapes.[10] Competitive athletes in that analysis may gain more VO₂max from polarized weeks. Recreational athletes may gain more from pyramidal weeks.[10]
Researchers still argue about it. In 2022 one journal printed a debate between two groups of researchers. Foster, Casado, Esteve-Lanao, Haugen and Seiler wrote the side titled "Polarized training is optimal for endurance athletes."[11] Burnley, Bearden and Jones wrote the side titled "Polarized training is not optimal for endurance athletes."[12]
Why can the same week look polarized or pyramidal?
The way you measure decides the label. Bellinger and colleagues tracked 14 highly trained middle-distance runners for eight weeks. They sorted all 695 runs three ways.[13]
| Measured by | Easy | Middle | Hard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Running speed | 79.9% | 5.3% | 14.7% |
| Heart rate | 79.6% | 17.0% | 3.4% |
| Effort rating | 39.6% | 31.9% | 28.5% |
By running speed, the training was polarized. By heart rate, the same training was pyramidal.[13] The training stayed the same, and only the measuring stick changed.
Part of the gap comes from heart rate lag. One treadmill study found that heart rate made about two thirds of its change within about a minute of a change in speed.[14] So sorting by heart rate can file the first part of each hard interval as middle. Pick one way to count your week and keep it.
Where does the gray band fit?
Easy, Threshold and VO₂max are three heart rate bands drawn from your max heart rate. Easy is the Zone 2 most runners know, and it matches the research's zone 1. It runs from 60% of your max up to 79% for men and 83% for women. Blood tests on runners found the first threshold at 78.9% of max for men and 83.6% for women.[15] The tops of Easy are drawn close to those averages. Threshold runs from 87% to just under 92%. VO₂max starts at 92%.
The space between Easy and Threshold is the gray band. The research's middle zone runs from the first threshold to the second. The second threshold came at 90.6% of max on average in the same blood-test study.[15] So the research's middle covers the gray band and the lower part of Threshold.
That makes the two shapes easy to see.
- A polarized week shows mostly Easy, a thin gray band and hard sessions that reach Threshold and VO₂max.
- A pyramidal week shows more gray and more Threshold.
- The threshold runs that elite runners do at 83% to 87% of max show up as gray for both men and women.[4]
Gray minutes are real training. Top distance runners choose to do some of their running there.
The pattern to watch is an easy run that drifts into gray by default. When your hours are fixed, each gray minute comes out of an easy minute or a hard minute. Your own bands show where those lines fall for you.
Find your heart rate zones
Type your age. Add your sex and a max you have seen if you know them. The example below is a 35-year-old.
Age 35 · max heart rate 208 − 0.7 × 35 = 184, an estimate
Your Easy band, your Zone 2111 to 146beats a minute
Your Easy band runs 16 beats higher than the common Zone 2 chart lets you go.
Max from age uses Tanaka’s formula (208 − 0.7 × age). Easy ends where blood tests find lactate starting to rise, which is higher for women than for men. What you type stays on this page.
Diastra reads your max from your own Apple Watch workouts or a guided test and draws your bands from it.
Start my free trialHow do you choose between polarized and pyramidal?
- Build the easy base first. Both shapes put most of the training into easy running. Treff's samples run from 70% to 80% easy, and Filipas's plans were 77% to 80% easy.[2][5] The two shapes differ only in how they split the rest.
- Keep easy runs in Easy. An easy run that creeps up adds gray minutes that neither shape asked for. The guide to easy run pace shows why that pace changes with heat, hills and long runs.
- Pick how to use the smaller share. A pyramid adds steady threshold runs just under the second threshold. A polarized week adds more interval work above it, like the Norwegian 4x4.
- Think about the calendar. Top distance runners tend to move from a pyramid toward a polarized week as their main race nears.[9] Filipas's runners improved most with that same order.[5]
- Count the same way every week. Heart rate, pace and effort ratings give different splits for the same training.[13]
What Diastra does with polarized and pyramidal weeks
Diastra draws your Easy, Threshold and VO₂max bands from your own max heart rate. It finds that max in the workouts your Apple Watch saved in Apple Health, in a guided test or in a number you type, and it tells you which one it used. The top of Easy is split by sex. The space between Easy and Threshold shows up as gray in your week. Those minutes do not fill your Easy, Threshold or VO₂max targets. Gray minutes don't glow. The watch taps your wrist when you drift out of your band, and Diastra credits only the minutes that held. Over the weeks Diastra shows whether your training is working. The page on how Diastra draws your bands explains where each edge comes from.
See your own bands from your own workouts.
Diastra reads every workout your Apple Watch saved, finds your real max heart rate and draws Easy, Threshold and VO₂max from it. Then it holds you in your band on every run and shows you over the weeks whether your training is working.
Start my free trial$119 a year, or $19.99 a month. Seven days free. For iPhone and Apple Watch.

More questions
Is polarized training the same as 80/20?
80/20 is the popular rounded version of the polarized pattern. Seiler's skiers did about 75% of their endurance sessions easy. Sample polarized weeks in the research put 15 to 20% of training in the hard zone. Both versions keep the middle small.
Does polarized training mean no tempo runs at all?
No. Polarized plans keep the middle small, and small is still more than zero. The polarized group that improved most in Stöggl and Sperlich's trial put 6% of its sessions in the middle.
Is a pyramid better for the marathon?
Top marathoners lean that way. A review of highly trained distance runners found that marathoners used more pyramidal weeks and 1,500 m runners used more polarized ones. A review of world-class runners found that both track and marathon runners add more race-pace running as the main race gets closer.
Can a recreational runner train polarized?
Yes. Both shapes start with a big base of easy running, and that part fits any runner. One large pooled analysis found that recreational athletes may gain more VO₂max from a pyramidal week than from a polarized one.
Sources
- Seiler KS, Kjerland GØ. 2006. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports 16(1):49-56.Eleven young skiers who raced at the national level had their two breathing thresholds tested, and about 75% of their endurance sessions stayed below the first one.
- Treff G, Winkert K, Sareban M, Steinacker JM, Sperlich B. 2019. The polarization-index: a simple calculation to distinguish polarized from non-polarized training intensity distributions. Front Physiol 10:707.Defined polarized as easy biggest, hard next and middle smallest, gave sample polarized, pyramidal and threshold weeks, and proposed one score to tell them apart.
- Treff G, Winkert K, Sareban M, Steinacker JM, Becker M, Sperlich B. 2017. Eleven-week preparation involving polarized intensity distribution is not superior to pyramidal distribution in national elite rowers. Front Physiol 8:515.Fourteen elite rowers trained about 93% easy on either plan for 11 weeks, and the polarized plan did no better than the pyramidal one.
- Haugen T, Sandbakk Ø, Seiler S, Tønnessen E. 2022. The training characteristics of world-class distance runners: an integration of scientific literature and results-proven practice. Sports Med Open 8(1):46.World-class distance runners do 5 to 15% of their running as threshold runs at 83 to 87% of max heart rate, and another 5 to 15% as faster intervals.
- Filipas L, Bonato M, Gallo G, Codella R. 2022. Effects of 16 weeks of pyramidal and polarized training intensity distributions in well-trained endurance runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports 32(3):498-511.Sixty well-trained male runners all improved on four plans with matched training load, and eight pyramidal weeks followed by eight polarized weeks improved most.
- Stöggl T, Sperlich B. 2014. Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training. Front Physiol 5:33.In 41 well-trained runners, cyclists, triathletes and skiers over nine weeks, the threshold group did 54% of its sessions at threshold and improved only slightly in work economy.
- Kenneally M, Casado A, Santos-Concejero J. 2018. The effect of periodization and training intensity distribution on middle- and long-distance running performance: a systematic review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 13(9):1114-1121.A review of 16 running studies found pyramidal and polarized training more effective than threshold training.
- Silva Oliveira P, Boppre G, Fonseca H. 2024. Comparison of polarized versus other types of endurance training intensity distribution on athletes' endurance performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med 54(8):2071-2095.Set one plan against another, polarized showed no clear difference from pyramidal or from threshold training in VO₂max or time trials.
- Casado A, González-Mohíno F, González-Ravé JM, Foster C. 2022. Training periodization, methods, intensity distribution, and volume in highly trained and elite distance runners: a systematic review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 17(6):820-833.Highly trained and elite distance runners mostly train in a pyramid and shift toward a polarized week in the racing season.
- Rosenblat MA, Watt JA, Arnold JI, Treff G, Sandbakk ØB, Esteve-Lanao J, et al. 2025. Which training intensity distribution intervention will produce the greatest improvements in maximal oxygen uptake and time-trial performance in endurance athletes? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data. Sports Med 55(3):655-673.Data from 348 athletes in 13 studies showed no difference between polarized and pyramidal training in VO₂max or time trials.
- Foster C, Casado A, Esteve-Lanao J, Haugen T, Seiler S. 2022. Polarized training is optimal for endurance athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 54(6):1028-1031.One side of a 2022 debate in the journal of the American College of Sports Medicine.
- Burnley M, Bearden SE, Jones AM. 2022. Polarized training is not optimal for endurance athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 54(6):1032-1034.The other side of the same 2022 debate, printed in the same issue.
- Bellinger P, Arnold B, Minahan C. 2020. Quantifying the training-intensity distribution in middle-distance runners: the influence of different methods of training-intensity quantification. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 15(3):319-323.The same eight weeks of training by 14 runners looked polarized by running speed and pyramidal by heart rate.
- Hunt KJ, Fankhauser SE, Saengsuwan J. 2015. Identification of heart rate dynamics during moderate-to-vigorous treadmill exercise. Biomed Eng Online 14:117.In 24 healthy men on a treadmill, heart rate made about two thirds of its change within about a minute of each change in speed.
- Nuuttila OP, Kaikkonen P, Sievänen H, Vasankari T, Kyröläinen H. 2025. The accuracy of fixed intensity anchors to estimate lactate thresholds in recreational runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 125(8):2161-2171.Blood tests on 165 recreational runners put the first threshold at 78.9% of max for men and 83.6% for women, and the second at 90.6% on average.